linux-kernel - Re: [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick periodic()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200809272121.53564.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date:	Sat, 27 Sep 2008 21:21:52 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel@...litt.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick periodic()

On Saturday, 27 of September 2008, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> [Rafael J. Wysocki - Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 05:56:46PM +0200]
> | This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> | of recent regressions.
> | 
> | The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> | from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> | (either way).
> | 
> | 
> | Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543
> | Subject		: kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
> | Submitter	: Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel@...litt.com>
> | Date		: 2008-09-11 16:46 (17 days old)
> | References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4
> | Handled-By	: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> | 		  Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
> | 		  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> | 
> | 
> 
> Hi Rafael!
> 
> Well, Thomas already explained
> 
> | The softlockup issue itself is fixed, but there are issues with
> | nmi_watchdog. I think we should remove the regression and keep the bug
> | alive to chase the other issues.
> |
> | Thanks,
> |
> |        tglx
> 
> so we either have to change the topic of this bug or better
> close it and post new one nmi_watchdog related. I may do so
> but since Joshua was opening bug it would be better if he
> make such an action. How do you think? (I've asked Joshua
> for additional info but it seems he is too busy now)

I had tried to close it, but someone reopened it afterwards.

Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/