[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0809262026450.21618@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 20:28:17 -0400 (EDT)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@...stal.dyndns.org>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
David Wilder <dwilder@...ibm.com>, hch@....de,
Martin Bligh <mbligh@...gle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] Unified trace buffer
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >
> > But at least as long as it's static, it's probably not _too_ noticeable if
> > the rest of the names don't overlap. We _do_ include <linux/rbtree.h>
> > almost everywhere, since we use those things in the VM, in timers etc, so
> > it comes in through pretty much all headers.
>
> Well, I just compiled it and it didn't have any name collisions, but that
> doesn't mean that this wont change in the future.
For kicks I just added #include <linux/rbtree.h> and it still passed. I
don't think we'll be adding new functions to rbtree.h, so it may be
fine to stay with the rb_ prefix.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists