[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48DFA285.1010701@panasas.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 18:28:05 +0300
From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
To: Leon Woestenberg <leon.woestenberg@...il.com>
CC: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com, jens.axboe@...cle.com
Subject: Re: scatterlist.c: bug in sg_next()?
Leon Woestenberg wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was code-inspecting 2.6.27-r7 through git web, when I came across this:
>
> In sg_next(), after following a chain_ptr, a few more checks should be
> performed.
> The rare case exists that the first entry in the chained list is a
> last marker, in case NULL must be returned.
>
> Can someone confirm and cook a patch?
>
> struct scatterlist *sg_next(struct scatterlist *sg)
> {
> if (sg_is_last(sg))
> return NULL;
> sg++;
> if (unlikely(sg_is_chain(sg))) {
> sg = sg_chain_ptr(sg);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SG
> + BUG_ON(sg->sg_magic != SG_MAGIC);
> +#endif
> + if (sg_is_last(sg))
> + return NULL;
> }
> return sg;
> }
>
> Signed-off-by: Leon Woestenberg <leon@...ebranch.com>
>
> Regards,
No! the last marker is set on a valid sg entry. Only it's next
is no longer valid. So the check at the top is for the Next-sg
not the passed-in-sg. What you thought of is a NULL terminating
sg-list. The end marker is so to save the extra NULL entry.
Boaz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists