linux-kernel - Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 2/2] dm: Add support for data integrity to DM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <yq163off0wx.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net>
Date:	Mon, 29 Sep 2008 11:05:02 -0400
From:	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To:	device-mapper development <dm-devel@...hat.com>
Cc:	martin.petersen@...cle.com, k-ueda@...jp.nec.com,
	jens.axboe@...cle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	agk@...rceware.org
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 2/2] dm: Add support for data integrity to DM

>>>>> "Kiyoshi" == Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@...jp.nec.com> writes:

Kiyoshi> Creating another function (e.g. dm_table_set_integrity(t,
Kiyoshi> md)) may be better, since then you wouldn't need dm_queue()
Kiyoshi> nor need to change the function interface of
Kiyoshi> dm_table_set_restrictions() I think.

You are right.  Originally I had more reasons for having that calling
interface change but that's no longer the case.  I'll fan the
integrity bits out to a separate function.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/