[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86802c440809291056m7369062ft6b16d17299ca5701@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 10:56:29 -0700
From: "Yinghai Lu" <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: "Krzysztof Helt" <krzysztof.h1@...zta.fm>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
sfr@...b.auug.org.au, "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: enable CPUID on Cyrix cpus with CPUID disabled
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Krzysztof Helt <krzysztof.h1@...zta.fm> wrote:
> From: Krzysztof Helt <krzysztof.h1@...pl>
>
> The macros setCx86_old() and getCx86_old() do not
> work as a comment says in the processor-cyrix.h.
>
> Use working inline functions instead to enable
> the CPUID instriction on Cyrix cpus.
>
> Tested on IBM 6x86MX cpu with disabled the
> CPUID instruction.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Helt <krzysztof.h1@...pl>
> ---
>
> This patch is against the linux-next tree (20080819)
> as it contains the following patch:
>
> x86, cyrix: debug
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
>
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git;a=commit;h=026e2c05ef58ef413e2d52696f125d5ea1aa8bce
>
> The linux-2.6-tip tree has not the Ingo's patch so it
> does not require my patch.
>
> I am confused. Is the x86 detection code for Cyrix
> cpus is right in the linux-next or in the linux-2.6-tip?
> Should I prepare patches against the linux-2.6-tip
> or linux-next?
linux-2.6-tip.
YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists