[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48E13B22.506@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 13:31:30 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: akataria@...are.com
CC: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
"avi@...hat.com" <avi@...hat.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Zach Amsden <zach@...are.com>,
Daniel Hecht <dhecht@...are.com>,
"Jun.Nakajima@...el.Com" <Jun.Nakajima@...el.Com>
Subject: Re: Use CPUID to communicate with the hypervisor.
Alok Kataria wrote:
>
> How does that matter, if we are able to standardize all this then,
> hypervisors which want to run a Linux guest should effectively play by
> the standards over here or else they would never work properly on Linux.
> What we are trying to do here is try to standardize things for Linux so
> that the Linux kernel implementation for Virtualization is that much
> more easier. If this goes well other closed source hypervisors too can
> effectively follow these standards.
> If the other closed source hypervisors define their own cpuid leafs they
> will still have to make Linux kernel side changes to make use of these
> new leafs. Which allows them to add to these pool of cpuid interface's
> too.
>
I don't think this is a realistic point of view, especically given who
we're dealing with in the closed-source world.
Without any kind of tagging of the information, it's realistically futile.
Intel/AMD haven't helped any by reserving a space which is entirely too
small.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists