[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48E1437D.7080606@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 14:07:09 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: "Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@...el.com>
CC: "akataria@...are.com" <akataria@...are.com>,
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
"avi@...hat.com" <avi@...hat.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Zach Amsden <zach@...are.com>, Daniel Hecht <dhecht@...are.com>
Subject: Re: Use CPUID to communicate with the hypervisor.
Nakajima, Jun wrote:
>
> For example, we can set the following ranges so that so that each VMM vender can define and implement features avoiding conflicts:
> vmware to define 0x4000001X
> xen to define 0x4000002X
> kvm to define 0x4000003X
> ...
>
Unless there is a central authority assigning these, "we" can do all we
want, enough people will not pay attention.
Basically, there needs to be a standards document that describes the
architecture, *and* needs to either have universal buy-in with all the
vendors or imposed by an authority with enough clout to do so (Intel might.)
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists