linux-kernel - RE: Use CPUID to communicate with the hypervisor.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 29 Sep 2008 17:56:47 -0700
From:	"Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@...el.com>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	"akataria@...are.com" <akataria@...are.com>
CC:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
	Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
	"avi@...hat.com" <avi@...hat.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Zach Amsden <zach@...are.com>, Daniel Hecht <dhecht@...are.com>
Subject: RE: Use CPUID to communicate with the hypervisor.

On 9/29/2008 5:31:31 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Alok Kataria wrote:
> >
> > Sure, some leaves have been defined already, but it's not too late
> > to try to go the generic route for the remaining leaves.
> > The longer we wait to come to a consensus on generic leaves, the
> > more contention we will have.  So let's try to address it now.
> >
>
> We don't have a quorum to create a consensus, since we only have a
> subset of the relevant parties present.

Who else do we need here?

>         -hpa
             .
Jun Nakajima | Intel Open Source Technology Center