[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0B53E02A2965CE4F9ADB38B34501A3A15726E52E@orsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 18:14:15 -0700
From: "Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@...el.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
CC: "akataria@...are.com" <akataria@...are.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
"avi@...hat.com" <avi@...hat.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Zach Amsden <zach@...are.com>, Daniel Hecht <dhecht@...are.com>
Subject: RE: Use CPUID to communicate with the hypervisor.
On 9/29/2008 5:58:01 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Nakajima, Jun wrote:
> > > >
> > > We don't have a quorum to create a consensus, since we only have a
> > > subset of the relevant parties present.
> >
> > Who else do we need here?
> >
>
> At least Parallels and Virtual PC/Virtual Server.
>
> -hpa
That should be doable. Although I'm not sure if their engineers want to discuss in public, we can come back with their ack/nak.
.
Jun Nakajima | Intel Open Source Technology Center
Powered by blists - more mailing lists