[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080930112728.GD21367@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 13:27:28 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@...tmail.fm>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86: split out dumpstack code from traps_xx.c
* Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@...tmail.fm> wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
>
> I intend to keep looking for possibilities to bring traps_32.c and
> traps_64.c closer to each-other. One trivial way (from my point of
> view) is to split out code into separate files. These two patches
> split out a large piece of code that has nothing to do with hardware
> traps. Are you willing to take those two patches? Or are they to
> intrusive?
they are not intrusive at all! The right way to do such things is to
keep them in reasonably small files.
> Patches are against the current master branch of the tip tree. The
> defconfigs compile fine and I ran some simple configs within qemu.
would be nice to bring dumpstack_32.c and dumpstack_64.c together as
well. While some of the details like IST stack logic (which dont exist
on 32-bit) are special, most of the glue, the iterators, the boot
parameters, and even the output should be unified some more.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists