linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/6] Unified trace buffer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 30 Sep 2008 13:53:15 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@...stal.dyndns.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] Unified trace buffer


a third type of lockdep splat surfaced in -tip testing:

=============================================
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
2.6.27-rc8-tip #37560
---------------------------------------------
swapper/0 is trying to acquire lock:
 (&cpu_buffer->lock){.+..}, at: [<ffffffff802906ac>] ring_buffer_lock+0x46/0x5e

but task is already holding lock:
 (&cpu_buffer->lock){.+..}, at: [<ffffffff802906ac>] ring_buffer_lock+0x46/0x5e

other info that might help us debug this:
2 locks held by swapper/0:
 #0:  (&rq->lock){++..}, at: [<ffffffff80754540>] schedule+0x16f/0x839
 #1:  (&cpu_buffer->lock){.+..}, at: [<ffffffff802906ac>] ring_buffer_lock+0x46/0x5e

stack backtrace:
Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.27-rc8-tip #37560
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff802743b6>] __lock_acquire+0xb2a/0x116f
 [<ffffffff80274a88>] lock_acquire+0x8d/0xba
 [<ffffffff802906ac>] ring_buffer_lock+0x46/0x5e
 [<ffffffff80756b7c>] _spin_lock+0x29/0x34
 [<ffffffff802906ac>] ring_buffer_lock+0x46/0x5e
 [<ffffffff8039d992>] __next_cpu+0x19/0x28
 [<ffffffff802906ac>] ring_buffer_lock+0x46/0x5e
 [<ffffffff80290762>] ring_buffer_reset+0x1c/0x58
 [<ffffffff802942b9>] update_max_tr+0x5f/0x7f
 [<ffffffff802954e0>] probe_wakeup_sched_switch+0x175/0x189
 [<ffffffff80754aa8>] schedule+0x6d7/0x839
 [<ffffffff80273de2>] __lock_acquire+0x556/0x116f
 [<ffffffff807567bb>] trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f
 [<ffffffff802732c8>] trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xb4/0xd7
 [<ffffffff807567bb>] trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f
 [<ffffffff80269ea4>] ktime_get_ts+0x21/0x4a
 [<ffffffff8026c44f>] getnstimeofday+0x38/0x98
 [<ffffffff80269ea4>] ktime_get_ts+0x21/0x4a
 [<ffffffff80227fc8>] native_sched_clock+0x8c/0xa6
 [<ffffffff8026b485>] sched_clock_tick+0x78/0x80
 [<ffffffff8027020f>] tick_nohz_restart_sched_tick+0x16b/0x178
 [<ffffffff802732c8>] trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xb4/0xd7
 [<ffffffff8021fd70>] cpu_idle+0x77/0x79
driver: '2-0:1.0': driver_bound: bound to device 'hub'

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/