[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <21d7e9970809291859s5bff81e3ue0f63402c2ad422d@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 11:59:58 +1000
From: "Dave Airlie" <airlied@...il.com>
To: "Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Jiri Kosina" <jkosina@...e.cz>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
jesse.brandeburg@...el.com
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.27-rc8
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 30 Sep 2008, Jiri Kosina wrote:
>>
>> Intel is working with us on tracking down and resolving the issue, but
>> this is not going as well as one would like to see (one attempt, one card
>> with completely hosed EEPROM contents ... and restoring the contents is
>> not *that* trivial).
>
> What's the magic to trigger it? I've got a laptop with that e1000e chip in
> it, and am obviously running a recent kernel on it. Do people have a
> handle on it? Is it actually verified to be kernel-related, and not
> related to the X server etc?
If we had the magic we'd have fixed it by now, the current working
theory is its X server related. This
hasn't been proven, though my ATI GPU e1000e seems fine so it may have
some legs.
If it is X related then its both a kernel + X server issue, the e1000e
driver opens the barn door, the X server drives the horses through it.
Of course until someone produces a way to fix the hw after it breaks,
reproducing this isn't something for the feint hearted. I'm hoping my
laptop
comes back today with a brand new motherboard in it.
Dave.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists