[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1222789837.17630.41.camel@nimitz>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 08:50:37 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Yasunori Goto <y-goto@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Gary Hade <garyhade@...ibm.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@...ibm.com>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, Chris McDermott <lcm@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Nish Aravamudan <nish.aravamudan@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: show node to memory section relationship with
symlinks in sysfs
On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 17:06 +0900, Yasunori Goto wrote:
> > +#define section_nr_to_nid(section_nr) pfn_to_nid(section_nr_to_pfn(section_nr))
> > #endif /* CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG_SPARSE */
>
> If the first page of the section is not valid, then this section_nr_to_nid()
> doesn't return correct value.
>
> I tested this patch. In my box, the start_pfn of node 1 is 1200400, but
> section_nr_to_pfn(mem_blk->phys_index) returns 1200000. As a result,
> the section is linked to node 0.
Crap, I was worried about that.
Gary, this means that we have a N:1 relationship between NUMA nodes and
sections. This normally isn't a problem because sections don't really
care about nodes and they layer underneath them.
We'll probably need multiple symlinks in each section directory.
-- Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists