[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48E25111.7060305@sgi.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 09:17:21 -0700
From: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/31] cpumask: Provide new cpumask API
Mike Travis wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
...
>
>> In what way will Rusty's changes differ? Since you incorporate some of
>> Rusty's changes already, could you please iterate towards a single
>> patchset which we could then start testing?
>
> Our timezones are not very conducive to a lot of email exchanges (and he's moving.)
>>>From what I've seen I believe he's leaning towards using struct cpumask * and
> less trickery than I have.
Oh yeah, I forgot the other major point of Rusty's approach. He wants the
patchset to be completely bisectable. That's far from true in my version.
Thanks,
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists