linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] LTTng relay buffer allocation, read, write

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 30 Sep 2008 10:23:21 -0700
From:	"Martin Bligh" <mbligh@...gle.com>
To:	"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	"Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>, od@...e.com,
	"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, hch@....de,
	"David Wilder" <dwilder@...ibm.com>,
	"Tom Zanussi" <zanussi@...cast.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] LTTng relay buffer allocation, read, write

On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 10:22 AM, Martin Bligh <mbligh@...gle.com> wrote:
>> A 4 byte dataless payload is useless anyway.
>
> Not at all convinced that's true - we used it for lots of things.
> Start and end of irq event is one frequent example.
>
> Also, in a compact mode, we can record start and end of
> syscalls like this (without parameters).

Ah, sorry, maybe I misread this. No data with no event ids, etc
is fairly useless. 4 bytes data including space to record event ids is OK.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/