| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20080930030236.230994826@goodmis.org> Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 23:02:36 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@...stal.dyndns.org> Subject: [PATCH 0/6] ftrace: port to the new ring_buffer These patches are against linux-tip. The first is just a fix in the wakeup selftest. The next is a port of the Unified tracer buffer to linux-tip and some updates. After that is the ftrace port to use the ring buffer, followed by some more enhancements to ftrace because of the new variable length buffer. I tried a few configurations and tried to test all the different ftrace tracers, but I'm sure there may be some bugs still to work out. I worked out all those that I found. But, with the ring_buffer I can envision several ways to clean up ftrace and to make adding new tracers cleaner. I'm also thinking about making a way that each tracer can allocate its own buffer, and allow for more than one tracer to be running at the same time! (only with different buffers). -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists