[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080930035412.GA7049@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 20:54:12 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [GIT pull] timer fixes for .27
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 01:41:56PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 15:44 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > Please pull the latest timers-fixes-for-linus git tree from:
> > >
> > >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip.git
> > timers-fixes-for-linus
> > >
> > > The patches fix hard to trigger bugs in the CPU offline code of
> > > hrtimers which were noticed by Paul McKenney recently. In the worst
> > > case they can leave migrated hrtimers in a stale state.
> >
> > Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Ah, so we found and fixed these ?
For "we" == Thomas, yes. ;-)
Thanx, Paul
> Linus, those bugs are actually a regression from when we didn't use the
> new timer code (which isn't that long ago). It would be nice to have the
> fixes in .27 (and thus in the various distros that will derive from it)
> but I would understand if the size of the patch made you choke that late
> in the -rc cycle... In which case we'll be in for more backports :-)
>
> Cheers,
> Ben.
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists