linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] slub: reduce total stack usage of slab_err & object

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1222854614.3052.16.camel@castor.localdomain>
Date:	Wed, 01 Oct 2008 10:50:14 +0100
From:	Richard Kennedy <richard@....demon.co.uk>
To:	Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
Cc:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
	penberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slub: reduce total stack usage of slab_err & object_err

On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 13:33 -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 12:37 -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 17:20 +0100, Richard Kennedy wrote:
> > > Yes, using vprintk is better but you still have this path :
> > > ( with your patch applied)
> > > 
> > > 	object_err -> slab_bug(208) -> printk(216)
> > > instead of 
> > > 	object_err -> slab_bug_message(8) -> printk(216)
> > > 
> > > unfortunately the overhead for having var_args is pretty big, at least
> > > on x86_64. I haven't measured it on 32 bit yet.
> > 
> > That's fascinating. I tried a simple test case in userspace:
> > 
> > #include <stdarg.h>
> > #include <stdio.h>
> > 
> > void p(char *fmt, ...)
> > {
> > 	va_list args;
> > 
> > 	va_start(args, fmt);
> > 	vprintf(fmt, args);
> > 	va_end(args);
> > }
> > 
> > On 32-bit, I'm seeing 32 bytes of stack vs 216 on 64-bit. Disassembly
> > suggests it's connected to va_list fiddling with XMM registers, which
> > seems quite odd.
> 
> Ok, on closer inspection, this is part of the x86_64 calling convention.
> When calling a varargs function, the caller passes the number of
> floating point SSE regs used in rax. The callee then has to save these
> away for va_list use. The GCC prologue apparently sets aside space for
> xmm0-xmm7 (16 bytes each) all the time (plus rdi, rsi, rdx, rcx, r8, and
> r9).
> 
> Obviously, we're never passing floating point args in the kernel, so
> we're taking about a 40+ byte hit in code size and 128 byte hit in stack
> size for every varargs call.
> 
> Looks like the gcc people have a patch in progress:
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-08/msg02165.html
> 
> So I think we should assume that x86_64 will sort this out eventually.
> 
thanks for the info. 

so vprintk _is_ the best solution. I did think it a bit strange to have
to add code to remove varargs to save stack space, but I didn't even
consider that it might be a gcc issue. 

 



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/