[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48E3B753.7000309@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2008 10:45:55 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: akataria@...are.com
CC: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
"avi@...hat.com" <avi@...hat.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@...el.com>,
Daniel Hecht <dhecht@...are.com>,
Zach Amsden <zach@...are.com>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] CPUID usage for interaction between Hypervisors and Linux.
Alok Kataria wrote:
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> Its not a user who has to do anything special here.
> There are *intelligent* VM developers out there who can export a
> different CPUid interface depending on the guest OS type. And this is
> what most of the hypervisors do (not necessarily for CPUID, but for
> other things right now).
>
It doesn't matter, really; it's still the wrong thing to do, for the
same reason it's the wrong thing in -- for example -- ACPI, which has
similar "cleverness".
If we want to have a "Linux standard CPUID interface" suite we should
just put them on a different set of numbers and let a hypervisor export
all the interfaces.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists