[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48E3C32B.3090701@goop.org>
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2008 11:36:27 -0700
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
CC: akataria@...are.com, "avi@...hat.com" <avi@...hat.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@...el.com>,
Dan Hecht <dhecht@...are.com>,
Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] CPUID usage for interaction between Hypervisors and Linux.
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> With a sufficiently large block, we could use fixed points, e.g. by
> having each vendor create interfaces in the 0x40SSSSXX range, where
> SSSS is the PCI ID they use for PCI devices.
Sure, you could do that, but you'd still want to have a signature in
0x40SSSS00 to positively identify the chunk. And what if you wanted
more than 256 leaves?
> Note that I said "create interfaces". It's important that all about
> this is who specified the interface -- for "what hypervisor is this"
> just use 0x40000000 and disambiguate based on that.
"What hypervisor is this?" isn't a very interesting question; if you're
even asking it then it suggests that something has gone wrong. Its much
more useful to ask "what interfaces does this hypervisor support?", and
enumerating a smallish range of well-known leaves looking for signatures
is the simplest way to do that. (We could use signatures derived from
the PCI vendor IDs which would help with managing that namespace.)
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists