[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48E3ECD1.30809@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2008 16:34:09 -0500
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
CC: akataria@...are.com, "avi@...hat.com" <avi@...hat.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@...el.com>,
Daniel Hecht <dhecht@...are.com>,
Zach Amsden <zach@...are.com>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] CPUID usage for interaction between Hypervisors and Linux.
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Alok Kataria wrote:
>
> I guess, but the bulk of the uses of this stuff are going to be
> hypervisor-specific. You're hard-pressed to come up with any other
> generic uses beyond tsc.
And arguably, storing TSC frequency in CPUID is a terrible interface
because the TSC frequency can change any time a guest is entered. It
really should be a shared memory area so that a guest doesn't have to
vmexit to read it (like it is with the Xen/KVM paravirt clock).
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
> In general, if a hypervisor is going to put something in a special
> cpuid leaf, its because there's no other good way to represent it.
> Generic things are generally going to appear as an emulated piece of
> the virtualized platform, in ACPI, DMI, a hardware-defined cpuid leaf,
> etc...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists