lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200810021036.29054.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date:	Thu, 2 Oct 2008 10:36:27 +1000
From:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Mike Travis <travis@....com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/31] cpumask: Documentation

On Wednesday 01 October 2008 19:13:25 Ingo Molnar wrote:
> that looks very sane to me.

Thanks, it's reasonably nice.  The task of hitting all those cpumask_t users 
is big, and I don't think we can do it in one hit.

> one small request:
> > I'll commit these to my quilt series today.
>
> IMHO, an infrastructure change of this magnitude should absolutely be
> done via the Git space. This needs a ton of testing and needs bisection,
> a real Git track record, etc.

Not yet.  Committing untested patches into git is the enemy of bisection; if 
one of my patches breaks an architecture, they lose the ability to bisect 
until its fixed.  If it's a series of patches, we can go back and fix it.

Now, once it's been tested a little, it's better for you to git-ize it and 
I'll send you patches instead.  But I want some more people banging on it, 
and a run through linux-next first...

If Mike's happy to work on these as a basis, we should be able to get there 
soon; the patches are sitting in my tree at http://ozlabs.org/~rusty/kernel/ 
(see rr-latest symlink).

Thanks,
Rusty.
PS.  To emphasize, I haven't actually *booted* this kernel.  My test machines 
are still in transit as I move (and ADSL not connected yet... Grr...)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ