[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081002090246.GD3550@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 11:02:46 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Steven Noonan <steven@...inklabs.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/serial/8250.c: 'i' may be used uninitialized
* Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Oct 2008 01:47:07 -0700
> Steven Noonan <steven@...inklabs.net> wrote:
>
> > serial_unlink_irq_chain() does not initialize iterator 'i', and that is
> > correct logically because it is always initialized, either in the
> > hlist_for_each or in the conditional immediately after (which fires if
> > hlist_for_each comes up empty-handed). GCC does not realize this
> > connection and emits a false warning. Annotate it with uninitialized_var().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Steven Noonan <steven@...inklabs.net>
>
> Ok definitive NAK. gcc 4.3.0 can work this out and doesn't produce a
> warning. Thanks for sending the patch though (and to the gcc folks for
> rendering it unnecessary)
thanks for sorting it out! A CONFIG_CC_DISABLE_WARNING_ANNOTATIONS=y
might be useful as well, which could be used periodically (by gcc folks)
to check which warnings are hidden by annotations?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists