[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20081002000339.6AA0C14543E5@imap.suse.de>
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2008 16:59:39 -0700
From: <gregkh@...e.de>
To: pq@....fi, 20080914134233.GE554@...e.hu, gregkh@...e.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
mingo@...e.hu, raziebe@...il.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
vegard.nossum@...il.com, x86@...nel.org
Cc: <stable@...nel.org>, <stable-commits@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: patch x86-fix-smp-alternatives-use-mutex-instead-of-spinlock-text_poke-is-sleepable.patch added to 2.6.26-stable tree
This is a note to let you know that we have just queued up the patch titled
Subject: x86: fix SMP alternatives: use mutex instead of spinlock, text_poke is sleepable
to the 2.6.26-stable tree. Its filename is
x86-fix-smp-alternatives-use-mutex-instead-of-spinlock-text_poke-is-sleepable.patch
A git repo of this tree can be found at
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
>From mingo@...e.hu Wed Oct 1 16:51:38 2008
From: Pekka Paalanen <pq@....fi>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 21:21:01 +0200
Subject: x86: fix SMP alternatives: use mutex instead of spinlock, text_poke is sleepable
To: Raz <raziebe@...il.com>, stable@...nel.org
Cc: the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>, Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>, carlos@...angeworlds.co.uk, Pekka Paalanen <pq@....fi>, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Message-ID: <20080914134233.GE554@...e.hu>
Content-Disposition: inline
From: Pekka Paalanen <pq@....fi>
commit 2f1dafe50cc4e58a239fd81bd47f87f32042a1ee upstream
text_poke is sleepable.
The original fix by Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>.
Signed-off-by: Pekka Paalanen <pq@....fi>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
---
arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c | 18 +++++++++---------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
-#include <linux/spinlock.h>
+#include <linux/mutex.h>
#include <linux/list.h>
#include <linux/kprobes.h>
#include <linux/mm.h>
@@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ struct smp_alt_module {
struct list_head next;
};
static LIST_HEAD(smp_alt_modules);
-static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(smp_alt);
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(smp_alt);
static int smp_mode = 1; /* protected by smp_alt */
void alternatives_smp_module_add(struct module *mod, char *name,
@@ -312,12 +312,12 @@ void alternatives_smp_module_add(struct
__func__, smp->locks, smp->locks_end,
smp->text, smp->text_end, smp->name);
- spin_lock(&smp_alt);
+ mutex_lock(&smp_alt);
list_add_tail(&smp->next, &smp_alt_modules);
if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_UP))
alternatives_smp_unlock(smp->locks, smp->locks_end,
smp->text, smp->text_end);
- spin_unlock(&smp_alt);
+ mutex_unlock(&smp_alt);
}
void alternatives_smp_module_del(struct module *mod)
@@ -327,17 +327,17 @@ void alternatives_smp_module_del(struct
if (smp_alt_once || noreplace_smp)
return;
- spin_lock(&smp_alt);
+ mutex_lock(&smp_alt);
list_for_each_entry(item, &smp_alt_modules, next) {
if (mod != item->mod)
continue;
list_del(&item->next);
- spin_unlock(&smp_alt);
+ mutex_unlock(&smp_alt);
DPRINTK("%s: %s\n", __func__, item->name);
kfree(item);
return;
}
- spin_unlock(&smp_alt);
+ mutex_unlock(&smp_alt);
}
void alternatives_smp_switch(int smp)
@@ -359,7 +359,7 @@ void alternatives_smp_switch(int smp)
return;
BUG_ON(!smp && (num_online_cpus() > 1));
- spin_lock(&smp_alt);
+ mutex_lock(&smp_alt);
/*
* Avoid unnecessary switches because it forces JIT based VMs to
@@ -383,7 +383,7 @@ void alternatives_smp_switch(int smp)
mod->text, mod->text_end);
}
smp_mode = smp;
- spin_unlock(&smp_alt);
+ mutex_unlock(&smp_alt);
}
#endif
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from pq@....fi are
queue-2.6.26/x86-fix-smp-alternatives-use-mutex-instead-of-spinlock-text_poke-is-sleepable.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists