[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081002072650.248373ea@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 07:26:50 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Give kjournald a IOPRIO_CLASS_RT io priority
On Thu, 2 Oct 2008 15:47:37 +0200
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com> wrote:
> Yes, it'll report '0' which means 'not set'. The kernel inteprets 'not
> set' as the default values, BE/4. There's a big diffence, since '0'
> means that we track CPU nice values where as if it returned be/4 then
> that is a strict/fixed setting.
argh. "0" means both "not set" and "highest priority".
how about we fix this?
right now "query + set" isn't idempotent.....
it should be able to be that.
--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists