linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Give kjournald a IOPRIO_CLASS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 2 Oct 2008 18:42:11 +0200
From:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc:	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Give kjournald a IOPRIO_CLASS_RT io priority

On Thu, Oct 02 2008, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Oct 2008 15:47:37 +0200
> Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com> wrote:
> 
> > Yes, it'll report '0' which means 'not set'. The kernel inteprets 'not
> > set' as the default values, BE/4. There's a big diffence, since '0'
> > means that we track CPU nice values where as if it returned be/4 then
> > that is a strict/fixed setting.
> 
> argh. "0" means both "not set" and "highest priority".

Arjan, please read the interface, it does not...

0 means not set, period. What matters is the class setting, if that is
non-zero then it is a valid setting. See

#define IOPRIO_PRIO_VALUE(class, data)  (((class) << IOPRIO_CLASS_SHIFT) | data)

So highest priority BE is IOPRIO_PRIO_VALUE(IOPRIO_CLASS_BE, 0), which
is of course valid.

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/