linux-kernel - Re: [RFC patch 0/5] genirq: add infrastructure for threaded interrupt handlers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 02 Oct 2008 13:09:05 -0700
From:	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Arjan van de Veen <arjan@...radead.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Jon Masters <jonathan@...masters.org>,
	Sven Dietrich <sdietrich@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC patch 0/5] genirq: add infrastructure for threaded
	interrupt handlers

On Thu, 2008-10-02 at 21:28 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com> wrote:
> 
> > > > Clearly threading irq handlers does have something to do with real 
> > > > time, unless this patch isn't actually threading anything ..
> 
> Well, that's clearly wrong: threaded IRQ handlers are not tied to 
> real-time in any way. Yes, they can be used for RT too but as far as the 
> upstream kernel is involved that's at most an afterthought.

You contradict yourself .. I said "Clearly threading irq handlers does
have something to do with real time" then you say "they can be used for 
RT too" .. So my comments are clearly correct , they have "something" to
do with real time. There exists a relationship of some kind or type.

You should go back and read my initial questions, they are reasonable ..

> > > Clearly you have neither clue about real time nor about operating 
> > > systems in general.
> > 
> > Here we go again Thomas.. You think you can have a conversation 
> > without the insults for once?
> 
> what Thomas said was a strong but fair reaction to your obviously 
> incorrect statement. What reaction did you expect?

We need less insults on this list not more.. Maybe I could understand
his reaction had I insulted him, but I didn't.. "Fair reaction" doesn't
fit in this case ..

Daniel

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/