linux-kernel - Re: [RFC patch 0/5] genirq: add infrastructure for threaded interrupt handlers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 2 Oct 2008 14:31:46 -0700
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Arjan van de Veen <arjan@...radead.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Jon Masters <jonathan@...masters.org>,
	Sven Dietrich <sdietrich@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC patch 0/5] genirq: add infrastructure for threaded
	interrupt handlers

On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 04:46:09PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> writes:
> >
> >  - move long running handlers out of the hard interrupt context
> 
> I'm not sure I'm really looking forward to this brave new world
> of very long running interrupt handlers. e.g. what do you
> do for example when some handler blocks for a very long time?

We have this issue today with some irqs (USB is known for issue here...)

So I don't think this is a big issue, and in the end, a better idea as
it might force us to confront some of the big abusers and fix them.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/