linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] Reclaim page capture v4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <28c262360810011946p443350d3hcb271720892e7b85@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 2 Oct 2008 11:46:12 +0900
From:	"MinChan Kim" <minchan.kim@...il.com>
To:	"Andy Whitcroft" <apw@...dowen.org>
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"KOSAKI Motohiro" <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@...radead.org>,
	"Christoph Lameter" <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Rik van Riel" <riel@...hat.com>, "Mel Gorman" <mel@....ul.ie>,
	"Nick Piggin" <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Reclaim page capture v4

Hi, Andy.

I tested your patch in my desktop.
The test is just kernel compile with single thread.
My system environment is as follows.

model name	: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU    Q6600  @ 2.40GHz
MemTotal:        2065856 kB

When I tested vanilla, compile time is as follows.

2433.53user 187.96system 42:05.99elapsed 103%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata
0maxresident)k
588752inputs+4503408outputs (127major+55456246minor)pagefaults 0swaps

When I tested your patch, as follows.

2489.63user 202.41system 44:47.71elapsed 100%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata
0maxresident)k
538608inputs+4503928outputs (130major+55531561minor)pagefaults 0swaps

Regresstion almost is above 2 minutes.
Do you think It is a trivial?

I know your patch is good to allocate hugepage.
But, I think many users don't need it, including embedded system and
desktop users yet.

So I suggest you made it enable optionally.

On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 9:30 PM, Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org> wrote:
> For sometime we have been looking at mechanisms for improving the availability
> of larger allocations under load.  One of the options we have explored is
> the capturing of pages freed under direct reclaim in order to increase the
> chances of free pages coelescing before they are subject to reallocation
> by racing allocators.
>
> Following this email is a patch stack implementing page capture during
> direct reclaim.  It consits of four patches.  The first two simply pull
> out existing code into helpers for reuse.  The third makes buddy's use
> of struct page explicit.  The fourth contains the meat of the changes,
> and its leader contains a much fuller description of the feature.
>
> This update represents a rebase to -mm and incorporates feedback from
> KOSAKI Motohiro.  It also incorporates an accounting fix which was
> preventing some captures.
>
> I have done a lot of comparitive testing with and without this patch
> set and in broad brush I am seeing improvements in hugepage allocations
> (worst case size) success on all of my test systems.  These tests consist
> of placing a constant stream of high order allocations on the system,
> at varying rates.  The results for these various runs are then averaged
> to give an overall improvement.
>
>                Absolute        Effective
> x86-64          2.48%            4.58%
> powerpc         5.55%           25.22%
>
> x86-64 has a relatively small huge page size and so is always much more
> effective at allocating huge pages.  Even there we get a measurable
> improvement.  On powerpc the huge pages are much larger and much harder
> to recover.  Here we see a full 25% increase in page recovery.
>
> It should be noted that these are worst case testing, and very agressive
> taking every possible page in the system.  It would be helpful to get
> wider testing in -mm.
>
> Against: 2.6.27-rc1-mm1
>
> Andrew, please consider for -mm.
>
> -apw
>
> Changes since V3:
>  - Incorporates an anon vma fix pointed out by MinChan Kim
>  - switch to using a pagevec for page capture collection
>
> Changes since V2:
>  - Incorporates review feedback from Christoph Lameter,
>  - Incorporates review feedback from Peter Zijlstra, and
>  - Checkpatch fixes.
>
> Changes since V1:
>  - Incorporates review feedback from KOSAKI Motohiro,
>  - fixes up accounting when checking watermarks for captured pages,
>  - rebase 2.6.27-rc1-mm1,
>  - Incorporates review feedback from Mel.
>
>
> Andy Whitcroft (4):
>  pull out the page pre-release and sanity check logic for reuse
>  pull out zone cpuset and watermark checks for reuse
>  buddy: explicitly identify buddy field use in struct page
>  capture pages freed during direct reclaim for allocation by the
>    reclaimer
>
>  include/linux/mm_types.h   |    4 +
>  include/linux/page-flags.h |    4 +
>  include/linux/pagevec.h    |    1 +
>  mm/internal.h              |    7 +-
>  mm/page_alloc.c            |  265 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  mm/vmscan.c                |  118 ++++++++++++++++----
>  6 files changed, 343 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>



-- 
Kinds regards,
MinChan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/