[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081001204311.241e04e5@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 20:43:11 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: auntvini@....usyd.edu.au
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Division of Load Average
On Thu, 2 Oct 2008 06:58:45 -0400
auntvini@....usyd.edu.au wrote:
> My self and my superviosr Dr David Levy have been working on
> introduction of new kernel code to correct the inherent problem of
> calculating load avarage by the current kernel. We have posted many
> e-mails in this regard since 2003 and kernel has been updated under
> the supervision of Rusty Russel.
>
> Also we had interactions with IBM group(balbir@...ibm.com) who was
> engaged in delayed stat calculations.
>
> We emphasise the following facts
> (1) seperation of Disk IO load from CPU load
>
> This comes as a correction to the existing kernel as the calculation
> of the existing kernel load average is based on the arithmatic
> addition of Disk IO and CPU loads
while you can argue if including disk makes sense or not, it's 20+
years of tradition on Linux, and more on Unix.
So.. whatever you do (and I think there's some sense in splitting
things out).. please only *add* stats, don't replace the existing ones.
--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists