[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20081003012003.f1f84937.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 01:20:03 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
rusty@...tcorp.com.au, jeremy@...p.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
travis@....com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, xemul@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [patch 3/4] cpu alloc: The allocator
On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 10:43:31 +0300 Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi> wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 00:33 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > +static void set_map(int start, int length)
> > > +{
> > > + while (length-- > 0)
> > > + __set_bit(start++, cpu_alloc_map);
> > > +}
> >
> > Can we use bitmap_fill() here?
>
> But bitmap_fill() assumes that the starting offset is aligned to
> unsigned long (which is not the case here), doesn't it?
umm, yeah, the whole bitmap interface is busted from that POV.
> ___On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 00:33 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > But I'd have though that it would be possible to only allocate the
> > storage for online CPUs. That would be a pretty significant win for
> > some system configurations?
>
> Maybe, but then you'd have to deal with CPU hotplug... iik.
Of course.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists