linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86: Add UV bios call infrastructure v2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 3 Oct 2008 11:10:12 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Russ Anderson <rja@....com>
Cc:	huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@...il.com>,
	Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86: Add UV bios call infrastructure v2


* Russ Anderson <rja@....com> wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 04:02:00PM +0800, huang ying wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 11:01 PM, Russ Anderson <rja@....com> wrote:
> > >
> > > efi_call_virt6() uses efi.systab->runtime->f.
> > > My call needs to use uv_systab, not efi.systab.
> > 
> > Yes. efi_call_virt6() is tied with standard EFI runtime services, so
> > it may be not suitable for your need. What you need is just to do
> > calling convention converting, like efi_call6 does. So I think it is
> > better to just use your current implementation.
> > 
> > Acked-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
> 
> Thanks.  Ingo, that is the v2 version of the patchset.

ok - could you please resend the lot with all the Acked-by's in place? 
(and with all the bits that are being objected left out)

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/