[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081003124300.17387.53881.stgit@dev.haskins.net>
Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2008 08:43:00 -0400
From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>
To: Chirag Jog <chirag@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, dvhltc@...ibm.com, dino@...ibm.com,
Gilles.Carry@...l.net
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] RT: Remove comment that is no longer true
We fixed the condition noted in the comment with the "pushable_tasks"
logic, but forgot to remove this comment. Lets clean it up.
Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>
---
kernel/sched_rt.c | 10 ----------
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched_rt.c b/kernel/sched_rt.c
index 57a0c0d..59ead84 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_rt.c
@@ -1125,16 +1125,6 @@ out:
return 1;
}
-/*
- * TODO: Currently we just use the second highest prio task on
- * the queue, and stop when it can't migrate (or there's
- * no more RT tasks). There may be a case where a lower
- * priority RT task has a different affinity than the
- * higher RT task. In this case the lower RT task could
- * possibly be able to migrate where as the higher priority
- * RT task could not. We currently ignore this issue.
- * Enhancements are welcome!
- */
static void push_rt_tasks(struct rq *rq)
{
/* push_rt_task will return true if it moved an RT */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists