[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081003130937.GF9651@us.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 08:09:37 -0500
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
To: Kentaro Takeda <takedakn@...data.co.jp>
Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, haradats@...data.co.jp,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [TOMOYO #9 (2.6.27-rc7-mm1) 1/6] LSM adapter functions.
Quoting Kentaro Takeda (takedakn@...data.co.jp):
> Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > Just keep your own hash table.
> I see, then we want one more LSM hook for clearing the hash table
> after returing from vfs_*().
>
> foo() {
> error = security_path_foo(); /* save result in the hash table */
> error = vfs_foo(); /* fetch from the hash table in security_inode_*() */
> security_path_clear(); /* clear the hash table */
> }
>
> Is it acceptable?
Why can't you just clear the value during security_inode_foo()?
Note I'm seeing this as a way for Tomoyo to temporarily (maybe) work
around the mis-placement of the security_path_foo() hooks. I don't want
to add security_path_clear() hooks to "legitimize" the workaround. I'd
rather Tomoyo and Apparmor folks keep looking for a better way to get
real DAC-before-MAC.
> Regards,
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists