lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 3 Oct 2008 15:23:42 +0100
From:	Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>
To:	"David P. Quigley" <dpquigl@...ho.nsa.gov>
Cc:	hch@...radead.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, casey@...aufler-ca.com,
	sds@...ho.nsa.gov, matthew.dodd@...rta.com,
	trond.myklebust@....uio.no, bfields@...ldses.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, selinux@...ho.nsa.gov,
	labeled-nfs@...ux-nfs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/14] NFS/RPC: Add the auth_seclabel security flavor
	to allow the process label to be sent to the server.

On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 01:06:23PM -0400, David P. Quigley wrote:
[...]
>  
> +	if (dom->flavour != &svcauth_unix
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
> +	    && dom->flavour != &svcauth_seclabel
> +#endif
> +	   )
>  	if (dom->flavour != &svcauth_unix)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	udom = container_of(dom, struct unix_domain, h);
> @@ -873,3 +889,80 @@ struct auth_ops svcauth_unix = {
>  	.set_client	= svcauth_unix_set_client,
>  };

checkpatch picked up on a suspect code indent for this hunk.  It is
unhappy about the second if expecting it to be indented.  By the looks
of this I am suspecting a miss-merge of the change in this function and
the second if should have been removed.  To my reading it actually still
does the right thing but ...

-apw
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ