[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200810031703.32114.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 17:03:31 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>,
Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>,
Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] Hibernation: Introduce new system state for the last phase of hibernation
On Friday, 3 of October 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 13:27:18 +0200 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
>
> > > Can we just create a new global?
> > >
> > > extern bool system_entering_hibernation_or_whatever;
> >
> > Yes, we can, but what about:
> >
> > extern bool system_entering_hibernation(void);
> >
> > that will become a static inline in case of !CONFIG_HIBERNATION,
> > and using a static variable?
>
> Sure, even better.
OK, I'll respin the entire series, then.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists