lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 3 Oct 2008 21:15:01 +0530
From:	Chirag Jog <chirag@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Gilles Carry <Gilles.Carry@...l.net>
Cc:	Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>,
	linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	rostedt@...dmis.org, dvhltc@...ibm.com, dino@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] RT: remove "paranoid" limit in push_rt_task

* Gilles Carry <Gilles.Carry@...l.net> [2008-10-03 15:46:59]:

> Sorry Greg,
>
> Neither PPC64 nor Intel64 make it with this patch.
> At boot time, it stops at the BUG_ON you added:
> 0xc00000000004eca4 is in push_rt_task (kernel/sched_rt.c:1102)
I am also confirming this issue gilles reported.

Although, i have a question:
When we enable group scheduling (CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED),
all the problems disappear.
After skimming through the rt scheduler code, I don't feel group 
scheduling alters the behavior of push/pull strategies in any way.

So I am wonder whether enabling group scheduling
actually solves the problem or just makes it tough 
to recreate?

> I let you do more investigations.
> Have a good week-end in you garage ;)
Have a great weekend :)
>
-- 
-Thanks,Chirag
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ