[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0810030935390.3208@nehalem.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 09:36:28 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: RE: [regression] Latest git has WARN_ON storm with e1000e driver
On Fri, 3 Oct 2008, Brandeburg, Jesse wrote:
>
> Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > So this whole bug is actually because that debug test is just
> > _broken_. It shouldn't be WARN_ON(preempt_count()), it should be
> > 'might_sleep()', which does it right.
> >
> > The right thing to check is "in_atomic() || irqs_disabled()".
>
> okay, do you want me to post a patch? I think Thomas is probably
> offline due to fridaynightitis. Change the code to:?
>
> WARN_ON(in_atomic() || irqs_disabled);
No, literally just "might_sleep()". It then does everything right,
including taking into account that we allow certain behavior during bootup
that we don't allow later.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists