[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081003141224.GA1466@ucw.cz>
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 16:12:37 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>,
Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>,
Alok Kataria <akataria@...are.com>,
Alok kataria <alokkataria1@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Yan Li <elliot.li.tech@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"joerg.roedel@....com" <joerg.roedel@....com>,
"rjmaomao@...il.com" <rjmaomao@...il.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Daniel Hecht <dhecht@...are.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] VMware detection support for x86 and x86-64
On Fri 2008-09-26 10:37:37, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
>> Which would be hardware implementers in the '80s getting wrong the first few
>> times what IBM did right the first time. Doesn't *anybody* do literature
>> searches before doing stuff anymore? ;)
>
> Well, yes. There are some prety strong reasons to believe that Intel
> got that one wrong *deliberately*, until VMware finally forced their
> hand.
Any details? Did intel try to force people to ia64?
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists