| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4727185d0810031550l32592f7ep2d1d37f93be12874@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 00:50:27 +0200
From: "Vincent Legoll" <vincent.legoll@...il.com>
To: "Bjorn Helgaas" <bjorn.helgaas@...com>
Cc: "Jesse Barnes" <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI probing debug message uniformization
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 8:57 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com> wrote:
> It'll be easier for Jesse if you include the proper changelog again
> with just a 1-2 line sample of the changed messages. BTW, the "--"
> before your sig confused my mailer into not quoting the patch itself,
> hence the screwed up formatting below.
The "-- " line is the start-of-.sig marker have I been taught in my
school days, I think they then spoke about netiquette...
> dev_info() is exactly equivalent to dev_printk(KERN_INFO). I usually
> use dev_info(), though I'm a bit ambivalent because it's nice to be
> able to grep for "printk".
I left dev_printk(KERN_INFO, ...) for grepability
> Anyway, maybe you can correct the grammar
> of "enabled forcedly" to something like "you can enable with ..." when
> you re-post with the changelog.
I've used "You can enable it back with", hoping the gramar is right
> (Note that dev_dbg() is NOT exactly equivalent to dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG),
> so you can't change all of them. dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG) is always
> compiled in, while dev_dbg() is only compiled in when "DEBUG" is defined.)
Thanks for the hint, for I may have jumped the gun on those "other" cleanups
;-)
So here is the new version cut'n'pasted from git-format-patch
######################### CUT HERE #####################
>From 6250265aded9adcc2bdd5f62977c02a936b641f0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll@...il.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 23:56:02 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] PCI probing debug message uniformization
This patch uniformizes PCI probing debug boot messages
with dev_printk() intead of manual printk()
It changes adress range output from [%llx, %llx] to
[%#llx-%#llx], like in pci_request_region().
For example, it goes from the mixed-style:
PCI: 0000:00:1b.0 reg 10 64bit mmio: [f4280000, f4283fff]
pci 0000:00:1b.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold
to uniform:
pci 0000:00:1b.0: reg 10 64bit mmio: [0xf4280000-0xf4283fff]
pci 0000:00:1b.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold
This patch has been runtime tested, boot log messages diffed,
everything looks OK.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll@...il.com>
---
drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c | 6 +++---
drivers/pci/probe.c | 21 +++++++++++----------
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
index 851f5b8..fa0d1a4 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
@@ -528,9 +528,9 @@ static int pcie_aspm_sanity_check(struct pci_dev *pdev)
pci_read_config_dword(child_dev, child_pos + PCI_EXP_DEVCAP,
®32);
if (!(reg32 & PCI_EXP_DEVCAP_RBER) && !aspm_force) {
- printk("Pre-1.1 PCIe device detected, "
- "disable ASPM for %s. It can be enabled forcedly"
- " with 'pcie_aspm=force'\n", pci_name(pdev));
+ dev_printk(KERN_INFO, &child_dev->dev, "disabling ASPM"
+ " on pre-1.1 PCIe device. You can enable it"
+ " back with 'pcie_aspm=force'\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
}
diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
index 36698e5..0ae65bf 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
@@ -304,8 +304,9 @@ static int __pci_read_base(struct pci_dev *dev,
enum pci_bar_type type,
} else {
res->start = l64;
res->end = l64 + sz64;
- printk(KERN_DEBUG "PCI: %s reg %x 64bit mmio: [%llx, %llx]\n",
- pci_name(dev), pos, (unsigned long long)res->start,
+ dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG, &dev->dev,
+ "reg %x 64bit mmio: [%#llx-%#llx]\n", pos,
+ (unsigned long long)res->start,
(unsigned long long)res->end);
}
} else {
@@ -316,8 +317,8 @@ static int __pci_read_base(struct pci_dev *dev,
enum pci_bar_type type,
res->start = l;
res->end = l + sz;
- printk(KERN_DEBUG "PCI: %s reg %x %s: [%llx, %llx]\n", pci_name(dev),
- pos, (res->flags & IORESOURCE_IO) ? "io port":"32bit mmio",
+ dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG, &dev->dev, "reg %x %s: [%#llx-%#llx]\n", pos,
+ (res->flags & IORESOURCE_IO) ? "io port" : "32bit mmio",
(unsigned long long)res->start, (unsigned long long)res->end);
}
@@ -389,8 +390,8 @@ void __devinit pci_read_bridge_bases(struct pci_bus *child)
res->start = base;
if (!res->end)
res->end = limit + 0xfff;
- printk(KERN_DEBUG "PCI: bridge %s io port: [%llx, %llx]\n",
- pci_name(dev), (unsigned long long) res->start,
+ dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG, &dev->dev, "bridge io port: [%#llx-%#llx]\n",
+ (unsigned long long) res->start,
(unsigned long long) res->end);
}
@@ -403,8 +404,8 @@ void __devinit pci_read_bridge_bases(struct pci_bus *child)
res->flags = (mem_base_lo & PCI_MEMORY_RANGE_TYPE_MASK) | IORESOURCE_MEM;
res->start = base;
res->end = limit + 0xfffff;
- printk(KERN_DEBUG "PCI: bridge %s 32bit mmio: [%llx, %llx]\n",
- pci_name(dev), (unsigned long long) res->start,
+ dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG, &dev->dev, "bridge 32bit mmio: [%#llx-%#llx]\n",
+ (unsigned long long) res->start,
(unsigned long long) res->end);
}
@@ -441,8 +442,8 @@ void __devinit pci_read_bridge_bases(struct pci_bus *child)
res->flags = (mem_base_lo & PCI_MEMORY_RANGE_TYPE_MASK) |
IORESOURCE_MEM | IORESOURCE_PREFETCH;
res->start = base;
res->end = limit + 0xfffff;
- printk(KERN_DEBUG "PCI: bridge %s %sbit mmio pref: [%llx, %llx]\n",
- pci_name(dev), (res->flags & PCI_PREF_RANGE_TYPE_64) ? "64" : "32",
+ dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG, &dev->dev, "bridge %sbit mmio pref: [%#llx-%#llx]\n",
+ (res->flags & PCI_PREF_RANGE_TYPE_64) ? "64" : "32",
(unsigned long long) res->start, (unsigned long long) res->end);
}
}
--
1.6.0.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists