[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4807377b0810021719m164e734cndaddb7006508cabc@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 17:19:06 -0700
From: "Jesse Brandeburg" <jesse.brandeburg@...il.com>
To: "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Olaf Kirch" <okir@...e.de>, "Jiri Kosina" <jkosina@...e.cz>,
"Jesse Brandeburg" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-netdev@...r.kernel.org, kkeil@...e.de, agospoda@...hat.com,
arjan@...ux.intel.com, david.graham@...el.com,
bruce.w.allan@...el.com, john.ronciak@...el.com,
chris.jones@...onical.com, tim.gardner@...el.com,
airlied@...il.com, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] e1000e: prevent concurrent access to NVRAM
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 4:42 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> The confirmed bugs where the nvram acquire code was called
> concurrently are still in your tree and the prevention patch along
> with the resulting bugfixes are stuck in some obscure intel QA
> process.
>
> Please apply at least the bug prevention patch below.
This is the same patch I posted 7 minutes ago, except that this patch
without the e1000e changes applied before it will cause all sorts of
WARN's to be printed during normal operation. If at all possible I
think they should stay together as a group to prevent un-necessary
noise in the logs.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists