[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48E72EFF.5040101@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2008 11:53:19 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: "Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@...el.com>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"akataria@...are.com" <akataria@...are.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Hecht <dhecht@...are.com>,
Zach Amsden <zach@...are.com>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] CPUID usage for interaction between Hypervisors and Linux.
Nakajima, Jun wrote:
> What's the significance of supporting multiple interfaces to the same guest simultaneously, i.e. _runtime_? We don't want the guests to run on such a literarily Frankenstein machine. And practically, such testing/debugging would be good only for Halloween :-).
>
>
If you can only expose one interface, you need to have the user choose.
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists