[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081005155614.GA5356@elte.hu>
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 17:56:14 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: <PING> Re: [patch x86/core] x86: allow number of additional
hotplug CPUs to be set at compile time
* Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> > and no way can any of this go into v2.6.27: this is fragile code
> > with a lot of historic baggage and the original error is non-fatal
> > to begin with. It can easily be backported to .27.1 if testing shows
> > that it has no other adverse side-effects.
>
> Please lets get rid of all this.
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
> ---------------->
> >From 344707c1f43dd0d080828497aacb60c0cc0a8c13 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 17:27:56 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] x86, smpboot: remove additional_cpus
>
> remove remainder of additional_cpus logic. We now just listen to the
> disabled_cpus value like we did for years. disabled_cpus is always >=
> 0 so no need for an extra check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
applied to tip/x86/core - thanks Thomas!
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists