[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <851fc09e0810050156y114007e4hbdf3e6c5562004d3@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 16:56:32 +0800
From: "huang ying" <huang.ying.caritas@...il.com>
To: "Yinghai Lu" <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Huang Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] x86: make 64bit efi to use ioremap_cache for efi_ioremap
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 1:44 AM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 2:35 AM, huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@...il.com> wrote:
[...]
>> Using __va and efi_ioremap() here is to make EFI support compatible
>> with kexec. Because EFI provide only efi_enter_virtual_mode(), no
>> efi_leave_virtual_mode(), we should make EFI runtime memory area
>> mapped to same virtual memory area in original kernel and kexeced
>> kernel, so that the EFI runtime services can be used in kexeced
>> kernel.
>
> so need to make efi range all under direct-mapping like E820-RAM?
Some EFI runtime range is just some RAM area used by EFI runtime
services, they can be direct-mapped. Some EFI runtime range may be IO
MEM range used by EFI runtime services, it is possible that these IO
MEM range can not be direct-mapped. So I implement efi_ioremap() to
deal with them.
Best Regards,
Huang Ying
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists