[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081005095134.GC29909@elte.hu>
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 11:51:34 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc: Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] fix printk format typo in boot ftracer.
* Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Oct 2008 22:58:12 +0200
> "Frédéric Weisbecker" <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > > - ret = trace_seq_printf(s, "[%5ld.%06ld] initcall %s
> > > "
> > > + ret = trace_seq_printf(s, "[%5ld.%09ld] initcall %s
> > > " "returned %d after %lld msecs\n",
> > > rettime.tv_sec,
> > > rettime.tv_nsec,
> >
> > I picked these formats from the printk.c time formatting. But you're
> > right, 09 would give us the whole nano precision.
>
> it's more than precision, it's correctness.
>
> doing "0.%02i" will do
> 0.100 if you pass it 100 and
> 0.10 if you pass it 10
>
> and most off the time, except the first 0.1 seconds, you'll be passing
> it 9 digits, but the first 0.1 seconds.. the %06 will just give really
> incorrect results.
applied to tip/tracing/core, thanks!
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists