[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20081006.101814.193697461.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2008 10:18:14 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: lkml@...garu.com
Cc: alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Honoring SO_RCVLOWAT in proto_ops.poll methods
From: lkml@...garu.com
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 00:17:18 -0500
> Looks like the RCVLOWAT patch breaks the tcp poll logic in the normal
> case.
Sorry, the condition was reversed, try this one instead:
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
index 1ab341e..7d81a1e 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
@@ -384,13 +384,17 @@ unsigned int tcp_poll(struct file *file, struct socket *sock, poll_table *wait)
/* Connected? */
if ((1 << sk->sk_state) & ~(TCPF_SYN_SENT | TCPF_SYN_RECV)) {
+ int target = sock_rcvlowat(sk, 0, INT_MAX);
+
+ if (tp->urg_seq == tp->copied_seq &&
+ !sock_flag(sk, SOCK_URGINLINE) &&
+ tp->urg_data)
+ target--;
+
/* Potential race condition. If read of tp below will
* escape above sk->sk_state, we can be illegally awaken
* in SYN_* states. */
- if ((tp->rcv_nxt != tp->copied_seq) &&
- (tp->urg_seq != tp->copied_seq ||
- tp->rcv_nxt != tp->copied_seq + 1 ||
- sock_flag(sk, SOCK_URGINLINE) || !tp->urg_data))
+ if (tp->rcv_nxt - tp->copied_seq >= target)
mask |= POLLIN | POLLRDNORM;
if (!(sk->sk_shutdown & SEND_SHUTDOWN)) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists