[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87tzbpmocm.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2008 22:59:37 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Jason Vas Dias <jason.vas.dias@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86 ACPI: Blacklist two HP machines with buggy BIOSes (Re: 2.6.27-rc8+ - first impressions)
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org> writes:
>
> This single instance of a piece of some HP gear being twisted beyond
> belief is IMO a minor annoyance and price to pay compared to the gain.
> Please note that apart from the DSDT being buggy on this machine, it has
> an incorrect IRQ 0 override in the ACPI table pointing to the pin #2 of
> the I/O APIC, which is in fact routed to the output of the master 8259A.
> Additionally the pin #0 of the I/O APIC which is indeed routed to the
> output of the 8254 does not receive any interrupts, presumably because of
> some misconfiguration during BIOS initialisation.
The real reason is actually a workaround in the BIOS for problems
in the older Linux code that caused duplicated timer interrupts. The
old Linux would fall into "enable both IO-APIC and 8259" fallback mode
and the resulted in duplicated timer events, which made everything unhappy.
They instead configured the northbridge in a way that one of the inputs
is ignored.
You won't be able to DMI list it, that workaround is widely used
in lots of different systems.
-andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists