[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081006060238.GB3180@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 08:02:38 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug #11569] Don't complain about disabled irqs when the system has paniced
On Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 07:32:54PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11569
> Subject : Don't complain about disabled irqs when the system has paniced
> Submitter : Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
> Date : 2008-09-02 13:49 (33 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122036356127282&w=4
The problem is actually worse than this description suggests. I updated
the bugzilla entry now.
The new smp_call_function() that is called from panic is quite unsuitable
for this task:
- It allocates memory (not a good idea in panic0
- It complains about interrupt off
- This whole thing breaks at least machine checks
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists