linux-kernel - Re: drivers/pci/probe.c compile warnings on -tip

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 6 Oct 2008 08:21:06 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc:	Steven Noonan <steven@...inklabs.net>,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
	Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
Subject: Re: drivers/pci/probe.c compile warnings on -tip


* Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:

> On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 3:18 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> >
> > * Steven Noonan <steven@...inklabs.net> wrote:
> >
> >> > AFAICT, these are fixed in Linus' tree, maybe the x86 tree needs an
> >> > update?
> >> >
> >>
> >> Hey Ingo, these warnings are still showing up on the latest -tip. Any
> >> idea why?
> >
> > yes, they got reintroduced via:
> >
> > | From ca81beb4a340ee690803fcb1498f863d0e68843f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > | From: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
> > | Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 20:57:15 +0200
> > | Subject: [PATCH] pci: fix BAR print out
> >
> > which spread into a few topic branches:
> >
> > # irq/sparseirq: ca81beb: pci: fix BAR print out
> > # irq/sparseirq: f430d990: Merge branch 'linus' into irq/sparseirq
> > # timers/hpet-percpu: ca81beb: pci: fix BAR print out
> > # x86/uv: ca81beb: pci: fix BAR print out
> > # x86/uv: f430d990: Merge branch 'linus' into irq/sparseirq
> >
> > i suspect f430d990 is where the in-linus fix collided with the
> > in-irq/sparseirq fix. I'm inclined to revert it. Yinghai?
> >
> 
> please. it should be reverted from irq/sparseirq etc branch...because
> updated one is already in linus tree.

ok, reverted it in irq/sparseirq and propagated that to the 
sparseirq-derived topic trees as well.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/