[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48EB2AE3.3080200@cosmosbay.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2008 11:24:51 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: minyard@....org, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, shemminger@...tta.com,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Convert the UDP hash lock to RCU
Peter Zijlstra a écrit :
> On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 23:22 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
>> Or just add SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU to slab creation in proto_register()
>> for "struct proto udp_prot/udpv6_prot" so that kmem_cache_free()
>> done in sk_prot_free() can defer freeing to RCU...
>
> Be careful!, SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU just means the slab page gets
> RCU-freed, this means that slab object pointers stay pointing to valid
> memory, but it does _NOT_ mean those slab objects themselves remain
> valid.
>
> The slab allocator is free to re-use those objects at any time -
> irrespective of the rcu-grace period. Therefore you will have to be able
> to validate that the object you point to is indeed the object you
> expect, otherwise strange and wonderful things will happen.
>
Thanks for this clarification. I guess we really need a rcu head then :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists